Saturday, November 30, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

UFOs tampering with nukes is 'smoking gun'

By T.K. Randall
May 11, 2013 · Comment icon 188 comments

Image Credit: CC 1.0 George Rebh
Former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel believes statements from Air Force officers are proof of a UFO coverup.
During an interview Gravel stated that he believed the testimonies of U.S. Air Force nuclear missile launch officers concerning unidentified objects interfering with the operation of American ICBMs represented conclusive evidence that government officials are lying when they claim to have no knowledge of UFO incidents that represent a risk to national security.

Gravel cited the testimonies of Captains Robert Salas, Bruce Fenstermacher, and David Schindele as a veritable 'smoking gun' that proves government secrecy on the subject. "It goes right to the White House, and of course, once the White House takes a position, ‘well there's nothing going on'...it just goes down the chain of command, everyone stands toe," he said.
Gravel first gained national recognition in 1971, by placing the still-classified Pentagon Papers - which documented U. S. government malfeasance during the Vietnam War - into the public record.


Source: Wall Street Journal | Comments (188)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #179 Posted by skyeagle409 12 years ago
Skyeagle, thank you for your post. Most of which I have already read and/or heard about. Some interesting stuff for sure. You are welcome! Many people are unaware that the USAF has already admitted that the objects in question are not ours. In fact, the U.S. Air Force referred to them as "interplanetary spaceships" in 1948 and reconfirmed that conclusion in its 1952 intelligence report.
Comment icon #180 Posted by Slave2Fate 12 years ago
You are welcome! Many people are unaware that the USAF has already admitted that the objects in question are not ours. In fact, the U.S. Air Force referred to them as "interplanetary spaceships" in 1948 and reconfirmed that conclusion in its 1952 intelligence report. And what about the intervening 60+ years? Slim pickings if one is able to separate the idea of UFO from alien craft as they are not now, nor have they ever been, synonymous.
Comment icon #181 Posted by skyeagle409 12 years ago
And what about the intervening 60+ years? Slim pickings if one is able to separate the idea of UFO from alien craft as they are not now, nor have they ever been, synonymous. The majority of military/UFO incidents are not reported through public media channels, but here are a few documents that have been revealed. In addition, there are over 110,000 UFO reports.
Comment icon #182 Posted by Slave2Fate 12 years ago
The majority of military/UFO incidents are not reported through public media channels, but here are a few documents that have been revealed. In addition, there are over 110,000 UFO reports. Ah, the warm fuzzies of nostalgia. I noticed the dates being from the mid 70's. Still a bit outdated considering recent research into things like atmospheric anomalies and such. Would you by chance have anything from the turn of the century ( ie post 2001)?
Comment icon #183 Posted by psyche101 12 years ago
I am very familiar with UFOs interfering with our nuclear missiles because I was stationed at HIll AFB, UT, from 1968-71. Hill AFB was involved in the investigations because my base provided support for the Air Force's Minuteman missiles. Good to see you Sky. Been a long time. I too must respectfully disagree with regards to the Nuke sites, the Hastings claims have been bandied around for too long, however when Tim Herbert revealed the wiring configuration of the silos, it became immediately apparent that the fault Hastings was trying to fabricate is simply impossible. The cables he thinks the... [More]
Comment icon #184 Posted by psyche101 12 years ago
You are welcome! Many people are unaware that the USAF has already admitted that the objects in question are not ours. In fact, the U.S. Air Force referred to them as "interplanetary spaceships" in 1948 and reconfirmed that conclusion in its 1952 intelligence report. Everything "tantalising" is old and aged and it seems apparent that is 3/4 of the reason why they are viewed as such. Been through chinese whispers, telephone and pass the parcel a dozen times or more, and come out with 7 or 8 versions that we can argue until the end of time and still not have a genuine answer. We need something n... [More]
Comment icon #185 Posted by quillius 12 years ago
I am very familiar with UFOs interfering with our nuclear missiles because I was stationed at HIll AFB, UT, from 1968-71. Hill AFB was involved in the investigations because my base provided support for the Air Force's Minuteman missiles. at last the main man is back......its more than good to see you Sky. Now all we need is McG and 1963 to join in and we will have ourselves a debate. edit to add: just seen 1963 pop up also.......good news.
Comment icon #186 Posted by quillius 12 years ago
I wish Skyeagle would spend his time doing that, instead of waisting it on this sci-fi nonsense. na, I think he is right where he belongs over here......... Ah, the warm fuzzies of nostalgia. I noticed the dates being from the mid 70's. Still a bit outdated considering recent research into things like atmospheric anomalies and such. Would you by chance have anything from the turn of the century ( ie post 2001)? yes this would be good......
Comment icon #187 Posted by psyche101 12 years ago
at last the main man is back......its more than good to see you Sky. Now all we need is McG and 1963 to join in and we will have ourselves a debate. edit to add: just seen 1963 pop up also.......good news. Won't be any debates with me and 63, we completely and utterly hate each other with a passion over his offence to an Australian term which he insisted on taking the wrong way, no matter how I tried to explain it. Just a thug I guess. But the rest of you guys I hold in high regard. After Zoser though, (and Bees latest tirade of nonsense) I think I am about done with ET. I have seen the pinnac... [More]
Comment icon #188 Posted by quillius 12 years ago
Won't be any debates with me and 63, we completely and utterly hate each other with a passion over his offence to an Australian term which he insisted on taking the wrong way, no matter how I tried to explain it. Just a thug I guess. But the rest of you guys I hold in high regard. After Zoser though, (and Bees latest tirade of nonsense) I think I am about done with ET. I have seen the pinnacle of silliness. Anything that can get that stupid is probably not worth the time. You have been an inspiration mate. It's been an honor to know, discuss and debate with you. If I do decide to move on soon,... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles