Saturday, November 23, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Spirituality > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All â–¾
Search Submit

Spirituality

Pope declares God was behind the Big Bang

By T.K. Randall
January 7, 2011 · Comment icon 254 comments

Image Credit: Shealah Craighead
The idea that the universe came in to being by accident should be rejected, the Pope has stated.
Speaking to a crowd of 10,000 at St Peter's Basilica Pope Benedict was adament that God was responsible for the Big Bang. "The universe is not the result of chance, as some would want to make us believe," he said. "In the beauty of the world, in its mystery, in its greatness and in its rationality ... we can only let ourselves be guided toward God, creator of heaven and earth."
God's mind was behind complex scientific theories such as the Big Bang, and Christians should reject the idea that the universe came into being by accident, Pope Benedict said on Thursday.


Source: News Daily | Comments (254)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #245 Posted by Ozner 14 years ago
Even if it is a list, it's still pretty illogical. God created light and day and night before any sun or stars existed. The bible was an oral traditional and it was taught to be literal; they actually thought that what the bible said is true but since this is not the case, now they just want to say that it's "Metaphorical" or whatever. I'm not so certain that people were always supposed to take religious history literally. Take the old Mesopotamian religions for instance. The god Marduk slays Tiamat, and builds the world out of her carcass. He lifts half of her body to create the sky, and he u... [More]
Comment icon #246 Posted by Arpee 14 years ago
I'm not so certain that people were always supposed to take religious history literally. Take the old Mesopotamian religions for instance. The god Marduk slays Tiamat, and builds the world out of her carcass. He lifts half of her body to create the sky, and he uses parts of her as pillars to hold up the world. The world is shaped as a disc, with the Deep below, the Heavens above, and a central pillar (the Ziggurat) in the middle, holding up the Heavens and reaching to the sky. The Mesopotamian knew that this wasn't meant to be taken literally though. The Sumerians knew that the world was round... [More]
Comment icon #247 Posted by markdohle 14 years ago
on what evidence do people rely on- to make a claim- that the universe went "BANG"why not poof-I like that better-the big POOF And it was,-Now Why would God need to make a Big noise about this?- Since there is no mention of there being any "bang"to its creation at all?-- Just maby-- God said thus & such-- &-It was-silently done-Or -Maybe He had a crew doing his bidding- -Like in Hitchikers guide to the galaxy, & maby they made alot of noise instead? There was no noise or bang, it was the expansion of the universe. Peace mark
Comment icon #248 Posted by Ozner 14 years ago
If these holy books are supposed to be the inspired word of god, then why even say it in a way which it could be misinterpreted? Wouldn't an all knowing god understand that it would be misinterpreted by people who are honestly wanting to worship him but it will get out of hand and some would think that they should kill all Jews because as the bible says "They are of the Synagogue of Satan" or commit other crazy crimes? How could an all loving God even say such things about his supposed own "chosen ones". I will certainly agree that the Bible does have many odd parts and inconsistencies. Anyway... [More]
Comment icon #249 Posted by Leonardo 14 years ago
When a perfect being inspires imperfect beings, the result will always be imperfect. Actually, that's not true. One can represent this in very simple mathematics. If God is perfect, then the chance that anything God will do (or inspire, etc) is incorrect is 0%. Whatever God does is perfect. Man is imperfect. We have no way of assigning a value to how imperfect Man is, but let us say Man is 100% imperfect, so anything Man does (or inspires, etc) will always be incorrect. Whatever Man does is imperfect. God inspires Man to write the bible. The chance that what Man writes will be incorrect is 0% ... [More]
Comment icon #250 Posted by Ozner 14 years ago
Actually, that's not true. One can represent this in very simple mathematics. If God is perfect, then the chance that anything God will do (or inspire, etc) is incorrect is 0%. Whatever God does is perfect. Man is imperfect. We have no way of assigning a value to how imperfect Man is, but let us say Man is 100% imperfect, so anything Man does (or inspires, etc) will always be incorrect. Whatever Man does is imperfect. God inspires Man to write the bible. The chance that what Man writes will be incorrect is 0% x 100%, or 0%. The result is always perfection. If God is perfect, anything God does ... [More]
Comment icon #251 Posted by Leonardo 14 years ago
The existence of everything outside of God is proof that God creates and tolerates imperfection. There are other possibilities. Either God is not perfect, or God creates that which is intentionally imperfect. I agree the former is a possibility, but I cannot reason how the latter could be possible. God must communicate to humans on human terms. Human language and human thought is limited, in order for a "perfect" message to get through to people they would have to be made perfect to understand it. You could argue that God could alter humanity's perception of it to make it the message come out ... [More]
Comment icon #252 Posted by Ozner 14 years ago
There are other possibilities. There are always many possibilities. I agree the former is a possibility, but I cannot reason how the latter could be possible. Well the world itself isn't perfect from our point of view. Unless the world is perfect in the sense that it's exactly the way God wanted it to be. Here, you are speculating what a perfect being is capable of. The truth is you do not know, so any argument incorporating 'limits' or 'mandates' with respect that perfect being carries no weight. Well, I'm trying more to argue about what a perfect being would want to do, although that is rela... [More]
Comment icon #253 Posted by Leonardo 14 years ago
True, but then it wouldn't matter what God did. It could seem incredibly flawed or bizarre from our point of view, but our opinion wouldn't matter, it would still be perfect. Only a perfect being would even be able to judge what perfection is. Agree 100%!!!! Who knows, maybe we are perfect!
Comment icon #254 Posted by yvan 14 years ago
that's a big statement to say/ declare


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles