Tuesday, November 12, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All â–¾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Antarctic melt creates dip in Earth's gravity

By T.K. Randall
October 2, 2014 · Comment icon 73 comments

Even the Earth's gravity is being affected by climate change. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 euphro
So much ice has melted in Antarctica that it has had a measurable effect on Earth's gravitational pull.
Abnormal weather conditions, the melting of the ice caps and a rise in sea levels are generally well known effects of global warming, but a recent announcement by the European Space Agency has highlighted a consequence of climate change that most people will have never even considered.

"The loss of ice from West Antarctica between 2009 and 2012 caused a dip in the gravity field over the region," the agency wrote.
Unbelievably, the amount of ice that has melted in Antarctica has been so significant that it has actually had a measurable effect on the gravitational pull of the planet - albeit a small one.

ESA made the discovery by combining high-resolution gravity field measurements from a modern satellite with equivalent measurements from a longer-running, older satellite.

While this change in gravity isn't likely to have any appreciable effect on our day-to-day lives it does help to drive home the extent to which global warming is continuing to change our world.

Source: Wired | Comments (73)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #64 Posted by Calibeliever 10 years ago
Is Al Gore a scientist? He makes himself an authority on the topic. I think both sides agree that Al Gore should go sit quietly in the corner for the rest of his life ... unless he's hunting for ManBearPig
Comment icon #65 Posted by regeneratia 10 years ago
I think both sides agree that Al Gore should go sit quietly in the corner for the rest of his life ... unless he's hunting for ManBearPig I never saw his movie. I wasn't going to PAY to be handed a mind-set. At least, a mind-set that is not subtle.
Comment icon #66 Posted by Doug1029 10 years ago
Is Al Gore a scientist? He makes himself an authority on the topic. Al Gore is not a scientist. Neither is he an authority on climate. "Not all that glitters is gold." Al has the basics down, but he isn't very careful with the details. He does the typical politician thing: if you don't know the answer, make one up. Scientists are pretty conservative about making claims unless they can back them up with research. Al Gore isn't. I agree with Cali - Al Gore should go sit in the corner. He's one of those friends we'd be better off without. The sun is doing some pretty strange, from our perspective... [More]
Comment icon #67 Posted by regeneratia 10 years ago
Al Gore is not a scientist. Neither is he an authority on climate. "Not all that glitters is gold." Al has the basics down, but he isn't very careful with the details. He does the typical politician thing: if you don't know the answer, make one up. Scientists are pretty conservative about making claims unless they can back them up with research. Al Gore isn't. I agree with Cali - Al Gore should go sit in the corner. He's one of those friends we'd be better off without. What effect the sun's current outburst will have on climate, if any, remains to be seen. I work with the Solar Cycle as eviden... [More]
Comment icon #68 Posted by Calibeliever 10 years ago
I never saw his movie. I wasn't going to PAY to be handed a mind-set. At least, a mind-set that is not subtle. Admittedly, I've been a tree-hugger all of my life. I'm neither proud nor ashamed of that. I've advocated against the human addiction to oil since the 80's. I felt we had to stop treating our home like a toilet and be less careless with the poisons we dump into our water and land. The climate talk went around for a bit in the 80's but it never gained much traction. Back then it was all about air quality and water pollution. So as EPA regulations began to work and the skies cleared (I ... [More]
Comment icon #69 Posted by Doug1029 10 years ago
Admittedly, I've been a tree-hugger all of my life. I've been an inventory forester for most of my career. I once guesstimated that I'd measured diameters on about 100,000 trees. So I guess that makes me a tree hugger, too. I was disheartened to see Bush repeal a lot of those regulations and I watched the air turn brown again. Bush convened an environmental committee which he was hoping would rubber-stamp his agenda. He didn't even wait for their report before he started dismantling EPA regs. Then when the committee gave its report which endorsed EPA, he refused to accept it. So they went publ... [More]
Comment icon #70 Posted by DieChecker 10 years ago
We have some problems that are, perhaps, more urgent. If we don't get off dead stop, tigers will go extinct, for example. But in the long run, climate change will be paramount. That's because it won't stop with two degrees. Climate models are forecasting four-to-six degrees rise in temperature by 2100. But in 2101 it will be warmer and in 2102 it will be warmer still. IPCC has so publicized 2100 that people think that's the end of the line. It's not. It will take maybe 300 to 500 years, but the end of the line is the boiling point, or close to it. Of course, the earth will never get that hot b... [More]
Comment icon #71 Posted by Doug1029 10 years ago
Oh, I don't know, there is always domes, and living underground. Humans could live comfortably with the surface at boiling. We could even run waterlines up there to power our turbines for the big underground farms for free. Live in a totally artificial environment? I think I'd rather go extinct. But it's going to take more than underground farms. We breathe air and that takes whole forests to maintain. It will be far easier (and cheaper) just to fix the system we've got, rather than try to build a whole new one. Do you REALLY think Koch Industries wants to pay the taxes that it will take to ma... [More]
Comment icon #72 Posted by Calibeliever 10 years ago
It will be far easier (and cheaper) just to fix the system we've got, rather than try to build a whole new one. It would fix itself if we would just stop breaking it.
Comment icon #73 Posted by DieChecker 10 years ago
Live in a totally artificial environment? I think I'd rather go extinct. But it's going to take more than underground farms. We breathe air and that takes whole forests to maintain. It will be far easier (and cheaper) just to fix the system we've got, rather than try to build a whole new one. Do you REALLY think Koch Industries wants to pay the taxes that it will take to maintain a completely artificial system? And if not them, who? The rest of us don't make that kind of money. Doug If humans are ever to go into space in large numbers this will be the way it will have to be done. We already do... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles