Friday, November 22, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Titan submersible - what exactly is a 'catastrophic implosion' ?

June 24, 2023 · Comment icon 275 comments

How was the sub destroyed ? Image Credit: OceanGate
Mechanical engineering expert Eric Fusil takes a look at what ultimately happened to the crew of the ill-fated expedition.
The four day-long search for the missing Titan submersible has come to a tragic end. Reports have confirmed the vessel was subject to a "catastrophic implosion" at some point during its voyage towards the Titanic shipwreck, which would have killed all five passengers instantly.

A debris field comprising "five different major pieces of debris" of various sections of the submersible was found on the sea floor by a remotely operated vehicle, about 500 metres away from the bow of the Titanic, officials said.

These findings are in line with previous news that an acoustic signature "consistent with an implosion" was detected by the US Navy on the same day the Titan began its descent.

The navy's seabed sensors detected the signature in the general area the vessel was diving when it lost communication with its mothership. At the time the signature was considered "not definitive".

What is a ‘catastrophic implosion'?

We can assume the implosion actually happened on the first day of the dive - but perhaps not exactly at the same time communication was lost with the mothership. But why did it happen?

Most, if not all, submersibles and submarines operating at depth have a pressure vessel made of a single metallic material with high yield strength. This is typically steel for relatively shallow depths (roughly less than 300m), or titanium for deeper depths.

A titanium or thick steel pressure vessel is usually a spherical shape that can withstand the crushing pressures you might expect at 3,800m - the depth at which the Titanic wreck lies.

The Titan, however, was different. It's pressure vessel was made of a combination of titanium and composite carbon fibre. This is somewhat unusual from a structural engineering perspective since, in a deep diving context, titanium and carbon fibre are materials with vastly different properties.
Titanium is elastic and can adapt to an extended range of stresses without any measurable permanent strain remaining after the return to atmospheric pressure. It shrinks to adjust to pressure forces, and re-expands as these forces are alleviated. A carbon-fibre composite, on the other hand, is much stiffer and does not have the same kind of elasticity.

We can only speculate about what happened with the combination of these two technologies, which do not dynamically behave the same way under pressure.

But what we can say almost certainly is that there would have been some kind of loss of integrity due to the differences between these materials. A composite material could potential suffer from "delamination", which leads to a separation of the layers of reinforcement.

This would have created a defect which triggered an instantaneous implosion due to the underwater pressure. Within less than one second, the vessel — being pushed down on by the weight of a 3,800m column of water — would have immediately crumpled in from all sides.

The final moments

When everything is designed, manufactured and tested perfectly, you've got a shape close enough to perfection that can withstand the overall pressure being applied from all directions. In this scenario, the material can "breathe" - shrink and expand as needed with depth. The Titan's implosion means this was not happening.

The implosion itself would have killed everyone within less than 20 milliseconds. In fact, the human brain can't even process information at this speed. As much as the news is devastating, perhaps it is somewhat reassuring the Titan's passengers would not have suffered a terrifying and drawn-out end.

Eric Fusil, Associate Professor, School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (275)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #266 Posted by susieice 1 year ago
I was watching TV and heard on some news program that OceanGate's website was still up so I looked for it. I spent some time looking around it. That sub had full capacity to video the trip, if it's cameras survived. The site shows other dives they had made and some that were being planned. I posted what was written about this Titanic trip but you can look around the site and see trips and videos they had made. https://oceangateexpeditions.com/tour/titanic-expedition/
Comment icon #267 Posted by pellinore 1 year ago
I've just come across this, which is an interesting read: Now as the world mourns the tragic loss of five lives and debates the sea-worthiness of the vehicle and all the wrongs the company OceanGate did, let us recall the story about a dramatic rescue that happened fifty years ago when another submersible sank to the ocean floor sparking a 76-hour international rescue operation. The World's Deepest Submarine Rescue | Amusing Planet
Comment icon #268 Posted by Jon the frog 1 year ago
Probably broke the world record of the the youngest lad to have died at this depth... 
Comment icon #269 Posted by pellinore 1 year ago
It seems that the crew of the Titan had 20 minutes to know things had gone wrong, it wasn't a case of them knowing nothing about the disaster:  
Comment icon #270 Posted by susieice 1 year ago
What language is the man in that video speaking in? The Polar Prince was registered in Canada. https://historyview.org/library/mv-polar-prince/ CCGS Sir Humphrey Gilbert was a Canadian Coast Guard light icebreaker and now a privately owned Arctic icebreaker Polar Prince. The ship entered service with the Department of Transport Marine Service in 1959 and transferred to the newly created Canadian Coast Guard in 1962, active until 1986. The icebreaker was sold to private interests in Newfoundland and the ship sat idle after 2001 until resold in 2009 to GTX Technology Canada Limited and renamed P... [More]
Comment icon #271 Posted by susieice 1 year ago
There had been fake trans going around. Can't find a website other than this one that even mentions this being online. https://thenamal.com/featured/titan-leaked-tran-shows-passengers-knew-about-the-fault/ James Cameron had said the sub was probably trying to surface when it imploded. https://www.insider.com/james-cameron-says-titan-sub-likely-tried-surfacing-before-imploded-2023-6
Comment icon #272 Posted by Antigonos 1 year ago
Deleted 
Comment icon #273 Posted by susieice 1 year ago
This was posted all over twitter but proven to be false. https://checkyourfact.com/2023/06/28/fact-check-was-the-titan-submersibles-gaming-controller-pictured-on-the-ocean-floor/
Comment icon #274 Posted by Antigonos 1 year ago
Yeah I saw that, that’s why I deleted
Comment icon #275 Posted by susieice 1 year ago
Just be careful with what you see going around out there. We aren't going to see any pictures or get any info unless the Coast Guard releases it. As the investigation goes on, they will.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles