Sunday, December 22, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

Major discovery upends what we know of Stonehenge's origins

By T.K. Randall
August 15, 2024 · Comment icon 25 comments
Stonehenge.
Stonehenge's origins are more complicated than we thought. Image Credit: PD - Erwin Bosman
One of the Neolithic monument's most iconic stones came from much further afield than previously thought.
Sitting isolated among the green fields of the Wiltshire countryside, Stonehenge - which dates back many thousands of years, remains one of the world's most enduring and intriguing monuments.

Now a "jaw-dropping" new study has turned what we know about the structure's origins on its head while demonstrating that there is still a great deal about Stonehenge that we don't yet understand.

The study concerns the largest bluestone - a huge piece of rock that did not originate from the immediate vicinity but was thought to have been taken from a site around 125 miles away in Wales.

Exactly how and why the ancient builders of Stonehenge managed to move this enormous stone over such a long distance with only primitive tools has long remained a topic of debate.
Now, though, this mystery has deepened even further still with the revelation that the bluestone didn't actually come from Wales at all, it came from Scotland - over 450 miles away.

This means that it had to be moved almost four times as far as previously thought.

It also suggests that people across the British Isles must have co-operated to make this happen.

"[This] doesn't just alter what we think about Stonehenge, it alters what we think about the whole of the late Neolithic," said Rob Ixer of University College London.

"It completely rewrites the relationships between the Neolithic populations of the whole of the British Isles. The science is beautiful and it's remarkable, and it's going to be discussed for decades to come."

Source: The Guardian | Comments (25)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #16 Posted by Piney 4 months ago
These were built by Neolithic Farmers. Not hunter-gatherers. 
Comment icon #17 Posted by Abramelin 4 months ago
But thàt's where the stone came from.
Comment icon #18 Posted by Abramelin 4 months ago
And another thing: ever heard of Blick Mead, an area near Stonehenge? The archaeologists working there consider it the 'first city'. And much, much older than Stonehenge, and probably the first builders of it. Edited to add links: https://www.sciencealert.com/new-find-near-stonehenge-could-rewrite-british-history https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2019/11/02/britains-first-city-discovered-archaeologists-say-home-people/
Comment icon #19 Posted by Mark_C 4 months ago
They might have cut the stones into a shape that's easier to move around like an imperfect cylinder, then finished of shaping them when they were in place.
Comment icon #20 Posted by qxcontinuum 4 months ago
Regardless of migration of tribes which was clearly evident since we have it on DNA, the struggle to explain how that massive rock was carried by ancients, remains valid requiring alternative explanations: forgotten technologies, giants, aliens, etc...
Comment icon #21 Posted by Abramelin 4 months ago
A wooden raft, even a boat would solve the trick.of transporting that stone.
Comment icon #22 Posted by Essan 4 months ago
We sometimes forget how sophisticated the Orcadians were back then.  They weren't simple hunter-gathers living in makeshift tents. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20151210-were-these-remote-wild-islands-the-centre-of-everything And they must have had decent boats to travel around the islands and visit the mainland. We also know that livestock from Scotland was consumed at Stonehenge https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/19/stonehenge-builders-feasted-animals-scotland-feast-exhibition
Comment icon #23 Posted by pellinore 4 months ago
This isn't directly related to your post, but I think it is ridiculous to believe a stone was moved from Scotland to Stonehenge by neolithic people. I live near Stonehenge, and on the one occasion I drove to Scotland it took me the best part of a day to get there. Why on Earth would people who lived on the S Coast of England go 800 miles to pick up a stone weighing goodness-knows-what and cart it down? (Same with the Bluestones from Wales, though that is slightly more believable). We are asked to believe people who were at least a thousand years from melting metals to understand the geography ... [More]
Comment icon #24 Posted by Piney 4 months ago
Your smarter than this.  I think there was a mistake in the EDXRF tests. The whole volcanic West Coast of the UK was created about the same time when Pangea split. 
Comment icon #25 Posted by Abramelin 3 months ago
Update: I was wrong: the stone didn't come from the Orkneys: https://www.iflscience.com/the-mystery-of-stonehenges-altar-stone-just-got-even-more-confusing-75856


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles